2.7
Item 7: Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)
Another important item for
a financial analyst is Item 7 which contains information that cannot
be found in the financial statements.
This item is intended to cover favorable and unfavorable
trends or events relating to liquidity, capital expenditures,
financing and operations.
However it is relatively open ended and as such this item has
always had questions raised in relation to its usefulness in
practice. For example in
an early study by M. L. Parva and M. J Epstein, Journal of
Accountancy March 1993 it was noted that although historical
information was summarized many companies provided no forward
looking information. In
a recent extensive study by the SEC of this item they reported
(source
http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2006/Aug/MdAReportCard.htm):
MD&A Report Card
August 2006
ON THE RECORD
What is the state of MD&A disclosure? The staff in the SEC’s
Division of Corporation Finance reviewed over 6,000 public
companies’ filings last year. They tell me that generally, MD&A
has improved. In many instances companies are better explaining
their financial statements, providing and clarifying context and
using MD&A to fill in some of those gaps in GAAP. ”
“ Despite this progress, there is still room for improvement.
Some companies are doing an ‘elevator analysis’ without ample
explanation. And some companies’ MD&A is still unnecessarily
lengthy and not focused on telling the story clearly. ”
“ Management’s story would be more complete if it contained more
forward-looking information, better explained trends and
uncertainties that affect the business and discussed in more
detail the business’ key drivers. ”
—SEC Commissioner Cynthia A. Glassman,
remarks at the 10th Annual Corporate Counsel Institute,
Washington, D.C., March 2006.
Thus even today there are
still questions about forward looking information in this item.
Companies do seem to be improving however, and as such this
is a useful item for analysts to read in conjunction with the
Financial Statements.
Finally, the SEC EDGAR
Database also contains filings from non-US companies that choose to
list their stocks on US exchanges.
These stocks are known as American Depository Receipts
(ADR’s). Formally, these
are "receipts" for shares of stocks of non-US companies held by US
banks and traded by investors in the US.
There are three levels of ADR’s.
Level I is the lowest level, traded over-the-counter with
minimal reporting requirements to the SEC.
Level II is listed and traded in the secondary stock markets.
A level II firm must file the equivalent of a 10-K and 10-Q
with the SEC. The
equivalent forms for ADR’s are 20-F and 6-K respectively for the
10-K and 10-Q forms.
Level III is the highest level and carries additional SEC reporting
requirements because such a firm can issue stock in the US primary
stock markets.
MD&A also contains a
section of Critical Accounting Judgments.
This is useful to read in an attempt to gauge the quality of
the financial reports.
Unfortunately omissions of discussion may be more important than
actual discussions in this section as well as reporting in other
parts of the 10-K. You
can read about this further in the latter part of the chapter Krispy
Kreme mini case study.